Today’s product development process is almost inevitable without user research. Thus, you should have a high-quality tool stack to upgrade research operations. Maze is a popular user testing platform; however, you can use its alternatives to fulfill your user research requirements. Do you want to learn the best Maze competitors and their comparison? Check the list below:
Maze vs Hubble
Hubble is one of the reliable maze alternatives. Maze’s Team plan offers limited studies, and the starter plan doesn’t support SDK integrations and links to major integrations, like an amplitude. Hubble offers cost-effective and flexible pricing plans with full support for integrations and other features. Maze SDK doesn’t offer potent internal product research. Hubble offers more power and options for integrations, attributes, custom events, and target URLs with user data platforms. Hubble offers many more options if you want to gather contextual user data. Maze supports various design tool integrations, such as Invision, Azure, Adobe XD, and Sketch. Hubble supports the best Figma integration.
Maze v/s UserTesting
UserTesting is a better option than Maze if you want to perform more moderated tests and access a broader panel, including B2B. You should go for it rather than Maze if you have a higher budget and want moderated interviews’ native integration. UserTesting delivers a much better touch service than Maze if you work with a bigger team and require closer support and consistent CSM attention. UserTesting can be a great choice if you require an enterprise solution with a bigger participant panel and better support for moderated tests and studies.
Maze v/s UserZoom
UserZoom is a famous user-researching tool that may help in both moderated and unmoderated search research. UserZoom offers more focus than Maze on unmoderated studies with a mixture of qualitative and quantitative outcomes. UserZoom has a bigger panel of testers than Maze and thus, offers a wider variety of personalities whom you can reach out to via your research. Go for UserZoom if you work for a mid-sized or big company and want to gather quantitative and qualitative research results from a big panel and assess other internal product insights. It is recommended to use the Maze starter version if you are a student or freelancer.
Maze vs Lyssna
Lyssna, earlier called “UsabilityHub,” is a UX research tool used by marketers, product managers, and designers to perform remote research. Its offerings are usability testing, market research, surveys, user interviews, functionality testing, and hiring of research participants. Lyssna and Maze are extremely popular user search tools that can deliver quick research results. Lyssna provides a bigger pool and stronger moderated support than Maze. Besides Lyssna, you can also use Hubble and UserZoom if you want to have a bigger participant pool and conduct unmoderated studies with perfect integrations.
Maze v/s Userlytics
Userlytics offers various research methods, live website testing, prototype testing, and 2 million participants. It offers open analytics, click tracks, user flows, and several features that help teams collect feedback on live products and designs. Userlytics can be a better choice than Maze for more cost-effective pricing plans and multiple lines of supported research for smaller teams of researchers and teams. Userlytics is a good choice for bigger companies that are required to perform research projects repeatedly. It offers various kinds of research and testing, including unmoderated and moderated testing, because of which it’s a good solution for product and UX teams to perform research.
Maze v/s Optimal Workshop
Optimal Workshop can be the right choice if you want an affordable user research tool. Maze and Optimal Workshop are light tools that help your teams perform primary research and offer value to both startups and small and medium enterprises. Maze does stronger integrations and provides clearer data visualization, whereas Optimal Workshop provides a bigger participant pool and advanced card-sorting modules. You can use Optimal Workshop if you have a small team in the starting phases of implementing user research, functioning in budget constraints, and can work without direct association with tools like Figma.
The Bottomline
Hopefully this post on the comparison of user testing platforms helps you in making the right choice suited to your requirements. The maze can always be one of the best research tools. However, you can always go for Maze alternatives such as Hubble and UserTesting for their benefits and if you need to use tools built for bigger teams with in-product research abilities.
